At the beginning of 2021, Gartner predicted that the market for low code development technologies worldwide would increase by 22.6% this year. Of course, data will come to be proven true or false in the future, but it seems that even non-technical people are familiar with the term these days since digital transformation (much of it has been accelerated by a lack of code and low code solutions) before the public eye.
Whether you’re all on the low-code hype train or not convinced, we must acknowledge the tangible benefits that these solutions are already bringing to the world.
Let’s say you’re a business owner looking to automate paper-based processes, manage contacts and communication through a CRM, or build a website quickly and easily. In this case, low code is an excellent way to go.
Low code can be a useful tool for building an MVP and embodying a concept within a small scale with precise product requirements and limited scaling plans. However, when the project develops normally, one will also need to upgrade the processes. With low code solutions, scaling is painful, expensive, and limited.
From a professional developer’s perspective, going the low code route to completing small projects, prototyping or building basic solutions is quick and mostly painless. However, most professionals prefer programming from scratch when working on complex applications due to flexibility. There is always the possibility that a low code platform will not allow you to create a product that meets new or changing requirements.
At best, low code is a practical tool, but at worst it is a poor long-term investment. why?
Scalability is a key issue
The opportunity and cost of horizontal and vertical scalability are vital factors when selecting a vendor. The number of daily active users, available features, storage, and computing power are just some of the factors to consider.
For example, if you are looking to set up an online store, consider whether the vendor you choose to do so by placing restrictions on your traffic or restricting access. If your site experiences an influx of visitors, they will limit access and force you to upgrade or lose business. What’s worse, this decision was made by Amnesty International and is non-negotiable. Top providers of website/store builder SaaS have been known to close customer accounts and stop responding completely.
Furthermore, short-term thinking, ever-changing requirements at the end of the business, and a lack of a methodological viewpoint will result in technology debt that silently restricts the growth of your business.
Finding the best solution for the organization as a whole is not always the most attractive option for managers considering the scope of their department, with the result that developers have to support legacy crumbling code. It’s a famous tragedy among developers, as well as the following.
Intensive training requirements
Extensive training will be the first requirement to implement a low code solution. This can significantly delay deployment, even to the point where the low code approach no longer wins out over rapid development in time to market.
After shopping for a car, negotiating with a salesperson, paying, and having the keys in hand, you can turn away a satisfied customer. But when you buy access to a low-code solution, you need to go to driving school again. Developers must first prepare themselves and learn how to work within a new system. They must actively learn how to use a new environment and nullify any experience they bring to the table.
Timeframes vary from weeks to months and will depend on the quality of documentation and support available. There is no industry standard, and each platform will have its own unique system.
Execution is only part of the puzzle. The real problem starts when a problem occurs and someone needs to fix it.
Troubleshooting is difficult
In the best case scenario, you plan your project ahead of time, choose a suitable solution, build it, and now it works well for your needs.
But something will inevitably break, as always. Again, depending on the quality of the documentation, the speed of response, and the efficiency of the support, the development team may need a long time to study and solve the problem because the same shortcuts that made development easy can get in the way of maintenance.
Debugging a program built with a low-code solution can be difficult or completely impossible because developers do not have access to the infrastructure that the code uses to operate. The developer may not know if the fault is on their end or the seller. Tracking down the issue can lead to a dead end when you can’t ask the developer team questions directly.
And if it turns out to be a file Cyber security weaknessYou have no luck.
fist sellers in
Your low code solution will not be compatible with any other competitor or similar provider. Even if you can export the source code, it will necessarily depend on the vendor platform to work, and you can only use it as a backup.
Depending on the solution, integration options, web hooks, APIs to add to the stack, and monthly SaaS billing will be available. and while Industry CEOs justify The high initial price through lower costs over time can be challenged by problematic maintenance and the difficulty of making upgrades.
If you go too deep and realize it’s time to move on to another service, you’ll find it impossible. The proprietary system that your team has learned to use and is proficient in to work in a requirements-compliant manner will now have to be abandoned at the end of the business, and you may need to start the process over from the beginning.
No symbol and low symbol are here to stay, but revolution is probably a misnomer. These solutions, while powerful, are just another tool in the pro’s kit. That is, it will only be published when requested.
The low code is cookie cutter, but it works, and that’s the point. Of course, no one expects these tools to shatter expectations or redefine standards, so if you need a short-term solution, if you’re building an MVP, or if you need something standard like an online store, go this route. But before you commit, make sure you have a deep understanding of where you work so that you can clearly formulate the requirements for the product you’re making and test them against the capabilities of the vendor.
Reviews are essential, of course, but ask your developers to study the documentation and provide their evaluation of any particular product before signing the contract. Your best bet is sellers with a lot of users that provide platforms for developers to communicate and have a rich library of materials that are easy to search.
Finally, watch out for red flags like delays, inaccurate documentation, and questionable support efficiency during development. It’s never too late to pull the plug if something isn’t working.